Sunday 5 May 2013

Archiving the Archivist! "The Celluloid Man"

Shivendra Singh's tribute to Mr P K Nair.

What a privilege it was for me to see “the Celluloid man” directed by Shivendra Singh Dungarpur. The film has got the award for best biographical film and best editor in the recently concluded National Awards. The film deserves all the awards possible because 1) The work of Mr Nair is very very important. It is because of him that we as film students or film buffs, have had the opportunity to see at least some of what Mr Nair could preserve of pre Independence Indian Cinema and some of the best of European, Russian and Japanese Cinema.2) Because what Mr Nair has done should not stop with him, but continue with the same passion and honesty (a thing which is not happening unfortunately). Because if we have a past and we don’t record History, it is lost forever or even more dangerously, can be distorted in the years to come.

Shivendra has told us the story of the untiring, passionate archival work done by Mr P K Nair, a legend at FTII and founder of the National Film Archives of India. What Hsuan Tsang did in terms of recording Indian History of the early 7th century AD and introducing Buddhism to China, Mr Nair has done for the history of Indian Cinema. Because History, it definitely is. Today we remember Dadasaheb Phalke as the father of Indian Cinema because Mr Nair travelled to Nasik in the year 1969 and salvaged what he could of the film clips that the sons of Dadasaheb Phalke parted with. He visited the bungalow where Dadasaheb Phalke had shot Raja Harishchandra. And today when he goes to the site where Dadasaheb Phalke used to live he is sad and so are you. The house has not been preserved. There is only a large commemorative stone on the road in the midst of small shops jostling for their daily business, which says that the father of Indian Cinema lived here once. So without Mr Nair we would still be fighting about who made India’s first film. Unfortunately in our country, giving credit to where it belongs almost always means taking it away from another person. In the bargain nobody is allowed to be celebrated at all! Let’s face it, archiving or preserving has never been our forte. We have allowed many an art form, folk form, Indian craft to become extinct because of lack of Govt. patronage or lack of a collective will. Many heritage monuments face disrespect from our country men daily. Our natural resources, flora and fauna have also not been spared. In this respect, Mr Nair’s childhood passion of preserving and recording things meticulously as well his mad love for Cinema, has helped scores of us directly as students of Cinema and many more film buffs who’ve watched the regular screenings that he threw open to the public so that we could be proud of our History. An audience for good Cinema has to be nurtured. He is not a hoarder who wants things for himself, he is a nurturer who wants to share. Therein lies his greatness. If he saw a genuine thirst in you, he would go out of his way to give you access to the many treasures lying behind the locked vaults of NFAI. A point brought about beautifully by the scores of film directors and actors who’ve graduated from FTII like Saeed Mirza, Naseeruddin Shaha, Kumar Shahani, Jahnu Barua, Hariharan, Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Shaji Karun, Ketan Mehta, Girish Kasarvalli, Shyam Benegal, Shabana Azmi, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Raju Hirani, Santosh Sivan, Balu Mahendra.

His evocative description of how he felt very royal sitting on the floor of the tent house Cinema to watch films as a child in Kerala; royal because the white sands of Kerala were associated with splendour, rituals, festivities and Cinema for young Nair was an expression of all that and much more. It was and still remains a fascination, a passion and an obsession with him. The film shows us so many rare sequences of old black and white films, it’s a film aficionado’s dream! It starts and ends with two of my favourite films, ‘Citizen Kane’and ‘Kaagaz Ke Phool’. Raja Harishchandra, Kaliya Mardan, Devdas, Meghe Dhaka Tara, Kismet, Achhut Kanya, Chandralekha, Kalpana and the Lumiere brothers’ “An Arrival Of A Train In A Station”, a film which fascinated Dhundiraj Govind Phalke and fuelled his passion for making moving images or movies.

Mr Nair can say the dialogues of Citizen Kane even without looking at the film running behind him. He can rattle of which reel the Odessa step sequence in ‘The Battleship Potemkin’ is or which reel the song “Door hato o duniya waalon Hindustaan hamaaraa hai” from the immensely popular black and white film “Kismet” is or many many more; the list just goes on. The thing which strikes you most is the effort to get films from all over India. Everything has become so Hindi film centric these days that many people forget the contribution of regional films like Bengali, Marathi, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Assamese, Oriya etc. to the History of Indian Cinema. But for Mr Nair Cinema is Cinema and has its own language and it needs to be preserved at all costs.

As one sees Mr Nair’s dissatisfaction at the way things are being run by callous people who have taken over from him in the years after his retirement in 1991, I remember a time I met Dr Kurien, (the father of the white revolution and founder of the first milk co-operative in Anand, Gujarat, popularly known as Amul) after he had just retired. I saw the dissatisfaction of a man whose entire life was devoted to this endeavour and the people who were meant to carry his legacy forward were busy discrediting him. I see the same sadness and pain in Mr Nair’s eyes. Those reel cans are his babies. He knows them better than he knew his own children for the most part of their growing life! There is a pain in his eyes about so many films that were not preserved by the people who made them; they were not stored or they were sometimes even sold for the silver in the negatives as happened in the case of India’s first talkie “Alam Ara”. That is lost! And what a loss it is! But Shivendra’s film is about a celebration of what is not lost because of Mr Nair. It is a celebration of what has been passed on to the most unlikely film audience. A wonderful account of common villagers, areca nut farmers in the village of Heggodu in Karnataka proves this point amply. A simple people without a Cinema hall were exposed to the best of Indian and World Cinema by the founder of Ninasam in Hegoddu, B V Subanna. He, with the help of Mr Nair showed films as diverse as Wild Strawberries, Pather Panchali, Rashoman to a film illiterate audience. Mr Subanna would translate what is going on in the film into Kannada for the villagers. These simple folk were so drawn into the films shown to them that they can still recall their favourite Bergmen film or discuss the impact of Kurosawa and Ray while getting the areca nuts out of the fruit. Wow! This reminded me of Arun Kaka( Khopkar) telling me after one of his visits to Russia how the Russians are so clued in to their culture that even a taxi driver can recite Pushkin or discuss Eisenstein.

In today’s world where more and more film makers are switching from shooting on film to shooting in a digital format, Mr Nair’s wistfulness about the smell of the negative and the magic of celluloid makes a very strong impact. It leaves you feeling sad for a magical era slowly dying before your eyes. It makes your heart ache for the subjects of honesty, hope and compassion that were told in that bygone era. It makes you wonder why there aren’t any people like those film makers or Mr Nair any longer. In a country where incompetence, crassness and stupidity is what constitutes political power, niceness and honesty are no longer values people hold. Compassion just doesn’t exist. And pride in one’s job is unheard of. Only egos exist over jobs never done and corruption has spread faster than termites at a piece of wood. People in power break laws, get away with murder and build castles on the blood and tears of their less privileged and helpless fellow beings. Trampling on the rights of tax paying citizens is rewarded every day. The end has to be money, whatever the means, is the motto today. Selflessness and sharing are almost looked upon as a sign of madness. And Cinema has become a prisoner of monetary gain or the over touchiness and lack of tolerance of violent people quick to ban, protest and torch.

In all this inhumanity, Shivendra’s celebration of the celluloid man, Mr Nair acquires a significance that is not limited to the fascinating subject he is presenting. It is a cry to bring back all the goodness that our country once had and to preserve it. Yes! Preservation is the key! Thank you Mr Nair. And thank you Shivendra for preserving on celluloid Mr Nair’s great celluloid contribution. It’s a fitting tribute indeed in the centenary year of Indian films. But an even more fitting tribute to the man whose work undoubtedly established Dadasaheb Phalke as the father of Indian cinema would be to honour Mr Nair with the Dadasaheb Phalke award. Anyone in the Government listening?

Friday 3 May 2013

Daam ek fillum anek! Bombay Talkies.


Bombay Talkies

One thing must be said, we have four of India’s best directors directing 4 shorts as a tribute to 100 years of Indian cinema. One goes in the theatre with a lot of expectations and some are fulfilled, others are not.  At the end comes a pathetic excuse for a song which should be shown the trash can immediately….did nobody hear this song before unleashing it on the poor audience? What a history we have of great Indian film music and we come up with this insipid tribute? It’s a shocking spoiler. But what precedes it is definitely worthwhile. Instead of the usual scenario where you have a lot of sound and fury and many crores of rupees spent on a length of 2 and ½ hours, signifying nothing (sorry Shakespeare) we have 4 delightful shorts succinctly told. I hope Bombay Talkies is a success just for the fact that more producers would back directors who would like to make a collection of short stories.  So here’s what I thought of them

Ajeeb Dastaan Hai Yeh…. Karan Johar.

I’m impressed with the tackling of a story with a gay protagonist. Though Saqib starts off on a great note, he falters a bit in his first scene with Rani, coming across as too glib. If I was his boss I wouldn’t have given him a trial run. But Rani’s character is more indulgent. Their friendship is fresh and I love her unquestioning, non-judgmental acceptance of his being gay. We need more sensitive portrayals of LGBT issues in the mainstream. Saqib gradually grows on you, it has less to do with his acting and more with the relationship he shares with Rani. And then, like all relationships, it becomes complicated. Rani I adore….even in films that are bad, she’s done a good job. Because she’s one of the best actresses we have. Maybe I’m biased.  Randeep shows the way to all actors who don’t know what to do in certain roles. When in doubt, play it down. He’s brave too, to play a character who finds his real self, discovers his alternate sexuality after years in a marriage that is pleasant, but one without passion. The use of Madan Mohan’s poignant “Lag jaa gale” is soul stirring. It makes you nostalgic and gooey eyed. The casting of the young street singer is wonderful. What I don’t like is the obvious studio recording of the young girl’s singing which just doesn’t match the rawness of the little girl’s situation.  Both the rendition of “Ajeeb Dastaan Hai Yeh”and “Lag jaa gale” suffers from the same studio sterility. But the first film has shown me a side of Karan Johar that has raised my expectations of him in his further works. Welcome Karan to the 1 and a ½ crore club :D

Star….Dibakar Bannerjee.

The story begins with amazing visuals. Just seeing the solitary mill chimney through the grills of the protagonist's window, brings on a nostalgia for the Bombay that was. Now the 'i'in the mill has changed to 'a'everywhere and the city is just not the same. The actress playing Nawazuddin’s wife is so real. So are the other women who banter with Nawazuddin. The casting director is really a star in this film. Dibakar got an Emu? Wow! It’s surreal….just like what happens to the protagonist (Nawazuddin) in this story based on a Satyajit Ray short story “Patolbabu filmstar”(I want to read the story)

An actor in search of any job (not necessarily acting), lands a walking part in a film shooting. He is given a dialogue  “Ae” to say as he bumps into the hero. And he has to walk away, that’s it! During the waiting period between being selected for the shot and the shot commencing you get to see his attempts at histrionics. You realise he’s a failed actor. Suddenly out of the garbage bin rises Sadashiv Amrapurkar and raises the film to another level altogether. He appears in the guise of an aged actor(who’s died long ago) playing  Vi Va Shirwadkar’s iconic “Natasamrath” in the Marathi play with the same title. Amrapurkar’s is a master class in acting. The energy, pitching, integrity and sheer talent just hits you in the gut. You want to stand up and applaud him and all the unsung heroes of theatre who have immense talent but gain very little in terms of money or fame. His scene with Nawazuddin is the most paisa vasool one for me in all the stories. And pardon me but Nawazuddin really struggles in this scene and also with the Marathi (Marathi bolnyaachaa attaahaas ka?) The scene in which he has to perform the iconic monologues of Amitabh Bachchan and Dharmendra, just left me cold. (Many people might disagree with me on Nawazuddin’s performance, because it’s not a politically correct thing to do. Even if you are the most powerful critic you NEVER say bad things about the bad performances of Bollywood stars AND star children, but you definitely DON’T talk ill of trained actors who’ve become stars in the event that you come off looking like a fool. But I maintain that even trained actors who have put up consistently good performances can fail if taken out of their comfort zones. And in any case I’m not a critic!) Nawazuddin really works when he doesn’t open his mouth.  And that’s not a compliment. His wife in the film has performed really well. He should have spent more time with her before the shooting perhaps! And of course the Emu leaves you wonderstruck. You are as wide eyed watching Dibakar’s short, as the Emu is watching everybody around it. Dibakar’s film is really magical and the only one out of the 4 that has stretched the brief. What a tribute to our cinema centenary and a tribute also to a man, a master, a genius, one of the greatest film makers in the world Satyajit Ray. And now I’m hungry for more. But it’s interval time. Sigh! When will we do away with intervals?

Sheila Ki Jawaani…. Zoya Akhtar.

The most disappointing of the 4 stories was Zoya’s “Sheila ki Jawaani”. There was so much potential in the story and the superb performances by the two child actors were to die for. But it was like an unfinished dream. Something was missing. I also didn’t like the choice of the horrid “Sheila ki Jawaani” as a song to gyrate to at the end of the film. As a parent I was disturbed. Not because the boy protagonist wanted to dress up like a girl and dance, but because I wouldn’t want even a young girl to gyrate to this adult song.  I felt the subject of gender specificity was not really tackled well. The story boiled down to a pair of really bad parents who had a pair of sensitive, creative children. The brother-sister relationship was so beautifully written and performed; Zoya needs to be lauded for that. Unfortunately she doesn’t seem to extend the same standards of acting to her adult cast of Ranveer Shorey (one expression throughout this film and in fact in most films he’s acted in), the actress playing his wife (totally forgettable and sorry, don’t know her name) and Katrina Kaif. I’m flummoxed by Zoya's choice of Katrina to tell one and all in an interview, that you can achieve your dreams if you believe in them strongly enough….all of us know if she was not associated with one of the biggest stars in Bollywood and he hadn’t taken her under his wings, she would be still walking the ramp after doing Kaizaad Gustaad’s forgettable “Boom”. To give it to her she looks every bit the fairy and I know kids adore her. Like Nawazuddin in Dibakar’s film, Katrina is most effective when she’s not speaking.  Theek hai…..at least one got to see two delightful children who performed with a rare maturity…..

Murabba….Anurag Kashyap

I expect a lot from Anurag who according to me is the ‘God of small films’ (sorry Arundhati Roy). I mean he is connected to 4 (or is it 5?) films showing at Cannes this year? That’s no small feat and should be applauded loudly. Here’s a maker who the French take seriously! (That’s saying a lot!) But as Spidey says, “With power comes responsibility” and I would add, “Expectations”! Is Anurag’s Murabba sweet? I would say, “Yes” for the most part, par rass kaa mazaa nahi aayaa! Rass thhaa hi nahi! There are some painfully contrived parts in this short that really made me wince,especially the breaking of the murabba bottle in the train. But the flaws that Anurag fails to cover up in terms of the flow of the narrative, he amply makes up for in the way he has shot the film and his complete command over the milieu, language and subject. Finally in the film, when Mr Bachchan meets the young fan from Allahabad, my jaw dropped more than the lucky actor playing that fan.  And he has really played the part well. I also loved all the other actors playing their small parts to perfection, especially the actor playing the security guard outside Prateeksha. This film is the sum of all these small parts. Finally,I have seen the crowds outside both Prateeksha and Jalsa a thousand times. And this story reflects the dream that brings so many people from all over India to Mumbai; a dream that very few realise. But in this khatta-meetha murabba there is a teekha ending when the half eaten murabba ends up in an achaar ki botal and one wonders why the father of the protagonist sent him on a painful mission to Mumbai at all? But then, how many people get to meet Mr. Bachchan in person? Magical? Just the thought….definitely!

Don’t stop here guys….bring more and more of it on….show the way for the next wonderful, exciting, path breaking 100 years of Indian cinema. Happy 100! J